Offences Introduced for Charging Visa Applicants for Employer Sponsorship
The Migration Amendment (Charging for a Migration Outcome) Act 2015 has been passed and came into effect from 14 December 2015.This legislation makes it illegal for a benefit to be given by a visa applicant to another person in return for a "sponsorship-related event". Effectively, this means that if a visa applicant pays an employer to sponsor them, the following can result:
- Refusal of a visa application - applicants must now declare that they have not paid for sponsorship, and this could result in Public Interest Criteria (PIC) 4020 refusal and a 3 year re-entry ban;
- Cancellation of the visa applicant's visa - even if this did not require employer sponsorship;
- Significant fines to the employer - up to $324,000 for a corporation
- Jail sentence of up to 2 years for the visa applicant, as well as a fine of up to $64,800 for individuals;
- Fines for company officers and directors who allow payment for sponsorship to occur due to recklessness or negligence, or if they know about it.
- Employer Nomination Scheme (ENS) Subclass 186;
- Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (RSMS) Subclass 187;
- Temporary Work (Long Stay Activity) Subclass 401;
- Training and Research Subclass 402 (Research stream);
- Entertainment Subclass 420; and
- Superyacht Crew Subclass 488.
"Benefits" which are prohibited include:
- Payments or valuable consideration
- Deductions - for example from a person's salary
- Real or Personal Property
- An advantage, service or a gift
- Payment of reasonable fees to a migration advisor is exempt from the above provisions
- Applying for approval as a sponsor, renewing this, or not withdrawing an application
- Applying for nomination
- Employing or engaging a person to work or perform an activity, or not terminating a person
No comments:
Post a Comment